Triple

T15432226
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil E369667 entity
Predicate seAplicaA P1129 FINISHED
Object conflictos de derecho privado LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conflictos de derecho privado | Statement: [Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil, seAplicaA, conflictos de derecho privado]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: seAplicaA
Context triple: [Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil, seAplicaA, conflictos de derecho privado]
  • A. appliesTo chosen
    Indicates that something is relevant, valid, or has effect in relation to a particular entity, case, or context.
  • B. appliesVia
    Indicates that an action, rule, or effect is carried out, implemented, or achieved through a specified method, medium, or mechanism.
  • C. appliesAt
    Indicates that an action, rule, or condition is relevant to or in effect at a specific location, context, or point in time.
  • D. appliesFrom
    Indicates that a rule, condition, or effect begins to be applicable starting from a specific point in time or state.
  • E. appliesAlsoTo
    Indicates that a condition, rule, or characteristic that applies to one entity is additionally applicable to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a19180081909925012fbf4e62a3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e03eda01cc8190843e23b260b8503c completed April 16, 2026, 1:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ded27f45548190a6d2b1b85cb47444 completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:21 a.m.