Triple
T1542504
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Retail Securities Services |
E32900
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedSecurityType |
P3487
|
FINISHED |
| Object | U.S. savings bonds |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. savings bonds | Statement: [Retail Securities Services, associatedSecurityType, U.S. savings bonds]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedSecurityType Context triple: [Retail Securities Services, associatedSecurityType, U.S. savings bonds]
-
A.
securityType
chosen
Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
-
B.
hasSecurityRelationship
Indicates a relationship in which one entity provides, manages, or is otherwise linked to the security or protection of another entity.
-
C.
protectionType
Indicates the kind or method of protection that is applied to or associated with an entity.
-
D.
securityArrangementsBy
Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
-
E.
hasSecurityNotion
Indicates that one entity possesses, defines, or is associated with a particular concept or notion of security in relation to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa95c1a2948190a2b98469afec1a7d |
completed | March 6, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b2453c8190a41f6b88c8217d1e |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.