Triple

T15419207
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject David Starsky E369327 entity
Predicate policeStatus P47732 FINISHED
Object undercover LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: undercover | Statement: [David Starsky, policeStatus, undercover]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: policeStatus
Context triple: [David Starsky, policeStatus, undercover]
  • A. lawEnforcementStatus chosen
    Indicates the relationship between an entity and its current standing or condition with respect to law enforcement, such as being under investigation, wanted, detained, or cleared.
  • B. policePresence
    Indicates that law enforcement officers are present at or monitoring a particular location, event, or situation.
  • C. policeSystem
    Indicates a relationship where an entity functions as, belongs to, or is governed by a system of law enforcement or policing.
  • D. policeControl
    Indicates that one entity exercises authoritative oversight, regulation, or enforcement power over another, as a police force does over people or areas under its jurisdiction.
  • E. policeNumber
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific police-related identification or reference number.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a1849f48190bf898068b2806fae completed April 10, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e03ebce4f48190ba282ecb4fb2f6fa completed April 16, 2026, 1:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ded27f45548190a6d2b1b85cb47444 completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:20 a.m.