Triple
T15415221
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | That's That |
E369202
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSmoothProduction |
P112501
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [That's That, hasSmoothProduction, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSmoothProduction Context triple: [That's That, hasSmoothProduction, true]
-
A.
hasProduction
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or responsible for, the creation or manufacture of another entity or product.
-
B.
hasPolishedProduction
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a work, performance, or product) exhibits a high level of technical refinement, smoothness, and professional-quality production.
-
C.
hasProductionMethod
Indicates that one entity is produced, created, or manufactured using the method, process, or technique specified by another entity.
-
D.
hasProductionValue
Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a particular level or type of production quality or cost.
-
E.
hasProductionHistory
Indicates that an entity is associated with a record or account of its past production activities, processes, or outputs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1849f48190bf898068b2806fae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03ea7561481909b04e613e2352f82 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ded27f45548190a6d2b1b85cb47444 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:20 a.m.