Triple
T1539373
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colorado Civil Rights Commission |
E32828
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyIn |
P1790
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission |
E5194
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission | Statement: [Colorado Civil Rights Commission, partyIn, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission Context triple: [Colorado Civil Rights Commission, partyIn, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission]
-
A.
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
chosen
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, on narrow grounds, that Colorado officials had shown unconstitutional hostility toward a baker’s religious beliefs when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against his refusal to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
-
B.
Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop
Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop is a Colorado lawsuit in which attorney Autumn Scardina sued baker Jack Phillips and his bakery for refusing to create a cake celebrating her gender transition, raising renewed questions about the balance between LGBTQ+ anti-discrimination protections and religious freedom.
-
C.
Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd.
Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. is a Colorado bakery best known for its central role in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case involving religious freedom and anti-discrimination laws.
-
D.
Colorado Department of State v. Baca
Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
-
E.
City of Boerne v. Flores
City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partyIn Context triple: [Colorado Civil Rights Commission, partyIn, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission]
-
A.
party
chosen
Indicates that an entity participates as a side or participant in an event, agreement, or situation.
-
B.
sponsorParty
Indicates that one party provides support, typically financial or promotional, to another party, often in exchange for association or visibility.
-
C.
speakerParty
Indicates the political party or group affiliation of the entity acting as the speaker in a given context.
-
D.
typicalParty
Indicates that an entity is a usual, standard, or characteristic participant in a given type of event, situation, or relationship.
-
E.
partOfEvent
Indicates that one entity is a component, segment, or sub-activity that belongs to or occurs within a larger event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa95c1a2948190a2b98469afec1a7d |
completed | March 6, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ad797907ac81908ede43626798827d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b2453c8190a41f6b88c8217d1e |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.