Triple
T1539278
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. |
E32826
|
entity |
| Predicate | resultOfSupremeCourtCase |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | narrow ruling in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: narrow ruling in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. | Statement: [Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd., resultOfSupremeCourtCase, narrow ruling in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultOfSupremeCourtCase Context triple: [Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd., resultOfSupremeCourtCase, narrow ruling in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd.]
-
A.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
B.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
C.
majorityJustices
Indicates that the referenced justices constitute more than half of the members of the relevant court or judicial panel in a given decision or context.
-
D.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
E.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa95c1a2948190a2b98469afec1a7d |
completed | March 6, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b2453c8190a41f6b88c8217d1e |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.