Triple
T1539232
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
E32825
|
entity |
| Predicate | courtRulesPower |
P18774
|
FINISHED |
| Object | promulgates rules of practice and procedure for Wisconsin courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: promulgates rules of practice and procedure for Wisconsin courts | Statement: [Wisconsin Supreme Court, courtRulesPower, promulgates rules of practice and procedure for Wisconsin courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: courtRulesPower Context triple: [Wisconsin Supreme Court, courtRulesPower, promulgates rules of practice and procedure for Wisconsin courts]
-
A.
courtOfficial
Indicates that an entity serves in an official capacity within a court, holding an authorized role in judicial or legal proceedings.
-
B.
courtRole
Indicates the specific capacity or position an entity holds within a court proceeding or judicial context.
-
C.
governingBodyForRules
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as the official authority responsible for creating, maintaining, or enforcing a specified set of rules.
-
D.
courtLanguage
Indicates the language officially used in legal proceedings or by a court.
-
E.
courtOrdered
Indicates that an action, condition, or relationship exists because it has been formally mandated or imposed by a court order.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa95c1a2948190a2b98469afec1a7d |
completed | March 6, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b2453c8190a41f6b88c8217d1e |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.