Triple
T15391848
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | League of the Public Weal |
E368062
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedJustification |
P89146
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defense of the public good |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defense of the public good | Statement: [League of the Public Weal, usedJustification, defense of the public good]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedJustification Context triple: [League of the Public Weal, usedJustification, defense of the public good]
-
A.
justificationUsedBy
chosen
Indicates that a particular justification is employed or relied upon by a given entity (such as a person, system, or decision).
-
B.
justification
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
-
C.
rejectedJustification
Indicates that a proposed justification or reason offered in a context (e.g., argument, decision, or claim) has been evaluated and not accepted as valid or sufficient.
-
D.
officialJustification
Indicates the formally stated reason or rationale that an authority or institution gives to legitimize an action, decision, or policy.
-
E.
justified
Indicates that an action, belief, or decision is supported by sufficient reasons or evidence to be considered reasonable or warranted.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1551a08190ba2caea7cd51c639 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e7838b48190862b43c6c8620692 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ded27b8cac8190bfa77698d53c5d1c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:19 a.m.