Triple
T15391514
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hooded man paradox |
E368055
|
entity |
| Predicate | isRelatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sorites paradox |
E368054
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sorites paradox | Statement: [Hooded man paradox, isRelatedTo, sorites paradox]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: sorites paradox Context triple: [Hooded man paradox, isRelatedTo, sorites paradox]
-
A.
Sorites paradox
chosen
The Sorites paradox is a classic philosophical puzzle about vagueness that questions when the gradual removal or addition of small parts leads to a significant change, such as when a heap of sand stops being a heap.
-
B.
grue paradox
The grue paradox is a philosophical thought experiment in the theory of induction that challenges how we justify projecting observed regularities into the future by introducing a bizarre, time-dependent predicate.
-
C.
Curry paradox
Curry paradox is a self-referential logical paradox that arises in certain formal systems without using negation, showing how naive reasoning about implication and self-reference can lead to triviality.
-
D.
Yablo's paradox
Yablo's paradox is a self-referential logical paradox involving an infinite sequence of sentences, each saying that all later sentences in the sequence are false, which challenges traditional notions of semantic paradox and self-reference.
-
E.
Arrow paradox
The Arrow paradox is an ancient philosophical argument that challenges the coherence of motion by claiming that a flying arrow must be motionless at every instant of its flight.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1551a08190ba2caea7cd51c639 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e7727a081908eff45bbc1633c8a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff1350699c8190acf7830d88455851 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:19 a.m.