Triple

T1538942
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Incorporation doctrine E32819 entity
Predicate keyCase P4528 FINISHED
Object Malloy v. Hogan E137554 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Malloy v. Hogan | Statement: [Incorporation doctrine, keyCase, Malloy v. Hogan]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Malloy v. Hogan
Context triple: [Incorporation doctrine, keyCase, Malloy v. Hogan]
  • A. Malloy v. Hogan chosen
    Malloy v. Hogan is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • B. Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
    Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a state-supported women-only nursing school policy as unconstitutional sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • C. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • D. Milliken v. Bradley
    Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
  • E. Palko v. Connecticut
    Palko v. Connecticut is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped define the doctrine of selective incorporation by holding that only certain fundamental rights in the Bill of Rights apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a9082c186c81909c5c4c1a8a47c603 completed March 5, 2026, 4:35 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad30997d408190916f16d31bcc35b4 completed March 8, 2026, 8:17 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.