Triple
T1538933
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Incorporation doctrine |
E32819
|
entity |
| Predicate | dominantForm |
P29628
|
FINISHED |
| Object | selective incorporation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: selective incorporation | Statement: [Incorporation doctrine, dominantForm, selective incorporation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dominantForm Context triple: [Incorporation doctrine, dominantForm, selective incorporation]
-
A.
dominantFormOf
Indicates that one form of something is the primary, prevailing, or most influential version relative to another form.
-
B.
dominantOn
Indicates that one entity exerts control, authority, or prevailing influence over another in a given context.
-
C.
dominantDialect
Indicates that one dialect is the primary or most influential form of a language within a particular context or region.
-
D.
dominantConstituentState
Indicates that one constituent state holds a primary or controlling position relative to other constituent states within a larger political or organizational structure.
-
E.
grammaticalForm
Indicates the specific grammatical structure or morphological form that an expression or word takes in a given linguistic context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a915f323bc8190aa757142c225e0ae |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b046448190be8ea4d7b20255f7 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a915f1694081908f87b509eda1309f |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.