Triple
T15386452
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kaiju War |
E367927
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableHumanDefense |
P118575
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Shatterdome bases |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shatterdome bases | Statement: [Kaiju War, notableHumanDefense, Shatterdome bases]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableHumanDefense Context triple: [Kaiju War, notableHumanDefense, Shatterdome bases]
-
A.
notableUnitType
Indicates that an entity is notably associated with, characterized by, or best known for a particular type of unit (such as an organizational, measurement, or structural unit).
-
B.
notableForce
Indicates that an entity is recognized as a significant or influential force affecting another entity, system, or context.
-
C.
notableCommanderOf
Indicates that an individual is a distinguished or historically significant commander associated with leading a particular military unit, force, or organization.
-
D.
defenseForces
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the military or protective force responsible for defending another entity.
-
E.
recognizesDefense
Indicates that one entity acknowledges, identifies, or accepts another entity’s defensive action, strategy, or legal defense as such.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1551a08190ba2caea7cd51c639 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e74ff70819094c1a85f51d6e228 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ded27742a881909cd73cc5c7d062fd |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ded57005608190886cd01f640dfedb |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:19 a.m.