Triple
T15384075
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ESRB E |
E367873
|
entity |
| Predicate | ratingProcessIncludes |
P118540
|
FINISHED |
| Object | publisher-submitted questionnaire |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: publisher-submitted questionnaire | Statement: [ESRB E, ratingProcessIncludes, publisher-submitted questionnaire]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ratingProcessIncludes Context triple: [ESRB E, ratingProcessIncludes, publisher-submitted questionnaire]
-
A.
ratingContext
Indicates the situational or contextual factors under which a rating is given or applies.
-
B.
ratingDescription
Indicates the textual explanation or qualitative summary associated with a given rating or score.
-
C.
rating
Indicates an evaluation relationship where one entity assigns a qualitative or quantitative score or judgment to another entity.
-
D.
ratingCategory
Indicates the qualitative classification or level assigned to a rating (e.g., low, medium, high) within an evaluation or scoring system.
-
E.
ratingSystem
Indicates a system or method used to assign evaluative scores or rankings to items, actions, or entities based on defined criteria.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1551a08190ba2caea7cd51c639 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e7397188190bde42b897ab4b5b4 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ded27742a881909cd73cc5c7d062fd |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ded57005608190886cd01f640dfedb |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:19 a.m.