Triple
T15371214
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dumas family |
E367550
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAdaptationsOfWorksIn |
P118487
|
FINISHED |
| Object | film |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: film | Statement: [Dumas family, hasAdaptationsOfWorksIn, film]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdaptationsOfWorksIn Context triple: [Dumas family, hasAdaptationsOfWorksIn, film]
-
A.
adaptedWorkOfAuthor
Indicates that a work is an adaptation derived from, based on, or reinterpreting the original work of a specified author.
-
B.
hasNotableAdaptationBy
Indicates that an original work has a significant adaptation created by the specified adapting entity (such as a person, group, or organization).
-
C.
adaptedWorkOf
Indicates that one work is derived from, based on, or reinterprets the content of another pre-existing work.
-
D.
adaptedAs
Indicates that one work, concept, or entity has been transformed or re-created into another form or medium based on the original.
-
E.
laterAdaptedIn
Indicates that something was subsequently adapted, modified, or reworked in a later context, version, or medium.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1483788190ad93c2748e8af34b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e5c1d548190930bfaf0861595ae |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ded27742a881909cd73cc5c7d062fd |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ded57005608190886cd01f640dfedb |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:18 a.m.