Triple
T15365222
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Comarca de Cuenca de Pamplona |
E367394
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Burlada |
E399434
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Burlada | Statement: [Comarca de Cuenca de Pamplona, contains, Burlada]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Burlada Context triple: [Comarca de Cuenca de Pamplona, contains, Burlada]
-
A.
Burlada
chosen
Burlada is a municipality in northern Spain, located in the autonomous community of Navarre and forming part of the metropolitan area of Pamplona.
-
B.
Corsicana
Corsicana is a small city in north-central Texas known for its oil boom history and as a regional commercial and transportation hub between Dallas and Houston.
-
C.
Wimberley
Wimberley is a small, scenic town in central Texas known for its picturesque Hill Country landscapes, swimming holes, and artsy, tourist-friendly downtown.
-
D.
Hannibal, Texas
Hannibal, Texas is a small rural unincorporated community located in Erath County in north-central Texas.
-
E.
Cotulla
Cotulla is a small city in La Salle County, Texas, known historically as a ranching and oilfield service center in the South Texas region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1483788190ad93c2748e8af34b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e497de48190be249b110999ec5c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:41 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff0b4cc39c81908a0aff959352f6d5 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:18 a.m.