Triple
T1534626
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Public Law 101-380 |
E32522
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPublicLawNumber |
P1117
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 101-380 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 101-380 | Statement: [Public Law 101-380, hasPublicLawNumber, 101-380]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPublicLawNumber Context triple: [Public Law 101-380, hasPublicLawNumber, 101-380]
-
A.
publicLawNumber
chosen
Indicates the specific public law identifier associated with a legislative act or statute.
-
B.
hasLegalInstrument
Indicates that there exists a formal legal document or instrument that establishes, governs, or records the relationship between the related entities.
-
C.
hasLegalEffect
Indicates that an action, document, or condition produces recognized legal consequences or enforceable rights and obligations.
-
D.
opusNumber
Indicates that a creative work is assigned a specific opus number identifying its place within a creator’s catalog or chronological sequence of works.
-
E.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ea86308190998f6bc14bb91f8e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a915f323bc8190aa757142c225e0ae |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b046448190be8ea4d7b20255f7 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.