Triple
T15342072
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OBR welfare analysis team |
E366817
|
entity |
| Predicate | analyses |
P170
|
FINISHED |
| Object | UK welfare system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: UK welfare system | Statement: [OBR welfare analysis team, analyses, UK welfare system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: analyses Context triple: [OBR welfare analysis team, analyses, UK welfare system]
-
A.
analyzes
chosen
Indicates that one entity systematically examines or evaluates another entity to understand its nature, structure, or components.
-
B.
analysisType
Indicates the specific kind or category of analysis being applied or performed in relation to an entity or dataset.
-
C.
helpsAnalyze
Indicates that one entity assists another in examining, interpreting, or understanding something in a more detailed or effective way.
-
D.
hasAnalysis
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or has undergone, a particular analysis or examination.
-
E.
analFins
Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by anal fins in relation to another specified context or classification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1355608190a6673ddb67231d54 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e14d8088190876fceca75d12322 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca991e5081908b0df3d1ee7d5338 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:17 a.m.