Triple
T15341859
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Coalition: Our Programme for Government |
E366812
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsProposal |
P96136
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fixed-term Parliaments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fixed-term Parliaments | Statement: [The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, containsProposal, fixed-term Parliaments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsProposal Context triple: [The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, containsProposal, fixed-term Parliaments]
-
A.
hasProposal
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is the subject of a specific proposal.
-
B.
hasProposed
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested or put forward something (such as an idea, plan, or offer) to another entity for consideration or acceptance.
-
C.
hasProposedResolution
Indicates that an entity has put forward a specific resolution or solution for consideration or decision regarding another entity or issue.
-
D.
hasProposedResolutionType
Indicates the type or category of resolution that has been formally proposed in relation to an issue, dispute, or decision.
-
E.
relatedProposal
Indicates that one proposal has a specified relationship or association with another proposal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1355608190a6673ddb67231d54 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e14d8088190876fceca75d12322 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca991e5081908b0df3d1ee7d5338 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:17 a.m.