Triple
T15341775
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2011 United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum |
E366811
|
entity |
| Predicate | electoralSystemProposed |
P17877
|
FINISHED |
| Object | alternative vote |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: alternative vote | Statement: [2011 United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum, electoralSystemProposed, alternative vote]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electoralSystemProposed Context triple: [2011 United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum, electoralSystemProposed, alternative vote]
-
A.
electoralSystemPreference
Indicates a relationship where an entity expresses a favored or chosen type of electoral system over other possible systems.
-
B.
changedElectoralSystem
Indicates that an entity has altered or replaced a previously existing electoral system with a different one.
-
C.
electoralSystemConcerned
Indicates that something is related to, affected by, or focused on a particular electoral system.
-
D.
electoralSystemContext
chosen
Indicates the electoral system or framework within which a political or electoral event, action, or relationship takes place.
-
E.
introducedVotingSystemChange
Indicates that an entity initiated or implemented a modification to an existing voting system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1355608190a6673ddb67231d54 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e14d8088190876fceca75d12322 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca991e5081908b0df3d1ee7d5338 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:17 a.m.