Triple
T15341634
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 |
E366808
|
entity |
| Predicate | reorganisesBody |
P1504
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Office of Fair Trading
The Office of Fair Trading was a former UK government body responsible for protecting consumer interests and promoting fair competition in markets.
|
E762899
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Office of Fair Trading | Statement: [Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, reorganisesBody, Office of Fair Trading]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Office of Fair Trading Context triple: [Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, reorganisesBody, Office of Fair Trading]
-
A.
Trade Practices Commission
The Trade Practices Commission was an Australian government agency responsible for enforcing competition and consumer protection laws before its functions were taken over by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
-
B.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is Australia’s national competition and consumer protection regulator, responsible for enforcing laws that promote fair trading, competition, and consumer rights.
-
C.
Competition Commission
The Competition Commission is Switzerland’s federal antitrust authority responsible for promoting competition and preventing anti-competitive practices in the Swiss market.
-
D.
Competition Commission
The Competition Commission was a former UK public body responsible for investigating mergers, markets, and regulated industries to promote fair competition before its functions were absorbed into the Competition and Markets Authority.
-
E.
Competition Bureau
The Competition Bureau is Canada’s independent law enforcement agency responsible for promoting and maintaining fair competition in the marketplace by administering and enforcing federal competition laws.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Office of Fair Trading Triple: [Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, reorganisesBody, Office of Fair Trading]
Generated description
The Office of Fair Trading was a former UK government body responsible for protecting consumer interests and promoting fair competition in markets.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Office of Fair Trading Target entity description: The Office of Fair Trading was a former UK government body responsible for protecting consumer interests and promoting fair competition in markets.
-
A.
Trade Practices Commission
The Trade Practices Commission was an Australian government agency responsible for enforcing competition and consumer protection laws before its functions were taken over by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
-
B.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is Australia’s national competition and consumer protection regulator, responsible for enforcing laws that promote fair trading, competition, and consumer rights.
-
C.
Competition Commission
The Competition Commission is Switzerland’s federal antitrust authority responsible for promoting competition and preventing anti-competitive practices in the Swiss market.
-
D.
Competition Commission
chosen
The Competition Commission was a former UK public body responsible for investigating mergers, markets, and regulated industries to promote fair competition before its functions were absorbed into the Competition and Markets Authority.
-
E.
Competition Bureau
The Competition Bureau is Canada’s independent law enforcement agency responsible for promoting and maintaining fair competition in the marketplace by administering and enforcing federal competition laws.
- F. None of above.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reorganisesBody Context triple: [Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, reorganisesBody, Office of Fair Trading]
-
A.
reorganized
Indicates that an entity has changed the structure, order, or arrangement of another entity or set of entities from a previous configuration.
-
B.
reorganizedIn
Indicates that an entity underwent a structural or organizational change within a specified context, time, or framework.
-
C.
reorganizedAs
chosen
Indicates that an existing entity has been restructured or reconfigured into a new organizational form or arrangement.
-
D.
reorganizedDueTo
Indicates that one entity was reorganized as a consequence of, or in response to, another specified factor, event, or condition.
-
E.
replacedBody
Indicates that one entity has taken the place of another entity’s body, substituting it in whole or in part.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1355608190a6673ddb67231d54 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03e14d8088190876fceca75d12322 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff01f55e9881908612c4e384836fb5 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ff030970588190a793cd710e819635 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:48 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ff04633de08190867ad3baec6b2b02 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca991e5081908b0df3d1ee7d5338 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:17 a.m.