Triple
T15328907
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hell: The Sequel |
E366481
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Living Proof |
E1108743
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Living Proof | Statement: [Hell: The Sequel, hasPart, Living Proof]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Living Proof Context triple: [Hell: The Sequel, hasPart, Living Proof]
-
A.
Living Proof
"Living Proof" is a song by American singer Kelis from her 2006 album *Kelis Was Here*.
-
B.
Living Proof
chosen
"Living Proof" is a hip-hop track by the rap duo Bad Meets Evil, showcasing the lyrical interplay and technical wordplay of Eminem and Royce da 5'9".
-
C.
Living Proof
"Living Proof" is a rock song by Bruce Springsteen from his 1992 album *Lucky Town*, reflecting on themes of love, renewal, and personal transformation.
-
D.
Make Up For Ever
Make Up For Ever is a professional cosmetics brand known for its high-performance makeup products widely used by makeup artists and beauty enthusiasts.
-
E.
Living Proof (live performance)
Living Proof (live performance) is a live rendition of the song "Living Proof," captured in concert to showcase the energy and spontaneity of its onstage performance.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a121520819093dcce999fdefe1a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03dffd6f88190a0f031ee90c6a7d2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fef8af92a88190bd47f1a484f25eb1 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:16 a.m.