Triple
T15311772
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Lincoln Lawyer |
E366054
|
entity |
| Predicate | character |
P662
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Maggie McPherson |
E1150514
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maggie McPherson | Statement: [The Lincoln Lawyer, character, Maggie McPherson]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Maggie McPherson Context triple: [The Lincoln Lawyer, character, Maggie McPherson]
-
A.
Maggie McPherson
chosen
Maggie McPherson is a recurring character in Michael Connelly’s legal thriller series, known as a skilled and determined prosecutor and the ex-wife of defense attorney Mickey Haller.
-
B.
Maggie Michell
Maggie Michell is one of the children of the late British film and theatre director Roger Michell.
-
C.
Maggie Campbell
Maggie Campbell is the spouse of Andy Campbell, known primarily in relation to his public profile.
-
D.
Maggie McNamara
Maggie McNamara was an American film and stage actress best known for her Academy Award–nominated performance in the 1953 romantic drama "The Moon Is Blue."
-
E.
Maggie McOmie
Maggie McOmie is an American actress best known for her role as LUH 3417 in George Lucas's 1971 science fiction film THX 1138.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a113ee881908e297a1d38dd79fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03cd2d5a88190aead748920f93d47 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff0b3dac6c81908eaa0aaad29113ee |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:16 a.m.