Triple
T15311036
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aisling |
E366035
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasKeyCreativeRole |
P101358
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cinematographer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cinematographer | Statement: [Aisling, hasKeyCreativeRole, cinematographer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeyCreativeRole Context triple: [Aisling, hasKeyCreativeRole, cinematographer]
-
A.
hasKeyCreativePartner
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a primary or central creative collaborator or partner to another.
-
B.
isKeyRole
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds a primary or critically important role within a given context or structure.
-
C.
hasCreativeScope
Indicates that one entity possesses authority or responsibility to make creative decisions or contributions within a defined domain or project.
-
D.
hasCreativeLeader
Indicates that an entity is led or directed in its creative aspects by a specific person or organization.
-
E.
hasCreatorRoleFor
Indicates that an entity serves in the role of creator for another entity, establishing a creator-to-created relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a113ee881908e297a1d38dd79fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03cd2d5a88190aead748920f93d47 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca935e2c8190b640987ddfc542b9 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:16 a.m.