Triple
T1530954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | First to Fight |
E32440
|
entity |
| Predicate | reflectsDoctrineOf |
P24258
|
FINISHED |
| Object | being first on the battlefield |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: being first on the battlefield | Statement: [First to Fight, reflectsDoctrineOf, being first on the battlefield]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reflectsDoctrineOf Context triple: [First to Fight, reflectsDoctrineOf, being first on the battlefield]
-
A.
followsDoctrine
Indicates that one entity adheres to, complies with, or acts in accordance with a specified doctrine or set of guiding principles.
-
B.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
C.
developedDoctrine
Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
-
D.
appliedDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
-
E.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ea86308190998f6bc14bb91f8e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a933ddc5a881909cdf503f2bc29bd4 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907ae8f688190ad9000ea1e018585 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.