Triple
T15306675
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Newnham on Severn |
E365916
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedNear |
P294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cinderford |
E370015
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cinderford | Statement: [Newnham on Severn, locatedNear, Cinderford]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cinderford Context triple: [Newnham on Severn, locatedNear, Cinderford]
-
A.
Cinderford
chosen
Cinderford is a small industrial town in Gloucestershire, England, historically associated with coal mining and situated within the Forest of Dean.
-
B.
Chagford
Chagford is a historic market town on the northeastern edge of Dartmoor in Devon, England, known for its former importance in the tin-mining industry and its picturesque rural setting.
-
C.
Cullompton
Cullompton is a historic market town in Devon, England, known for its agricultural heritage and location in the Culm Valley.
-
D.
Cirencester
Cirencester is a historic market town in south-central England, renowned for its Roman heritage and Cotswold architecture.
-
E.
Blagdon
Blagdon is a rural village in North Somerset, England, known for its proximity to Blagdon Lake and the Mendip Hills.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a113ee881908e297a1d38dd79fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03cd001b48190bbdd69337efdb907 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff2cea6bb88190a6d6f7c55daa4677 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:16 a.m.