Triple
T15305757
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Symbolic Lodge |
E365892
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGovernanceForm |
P118045
|
FINISHED |
| Object | representative democracy among members |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: representative democracy among members | Statement: [Symbolic Lodge, hasGovernanceForm, representative democracy among members]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGovernanceForm Context triple: [Symbolic Lodge, hasGovernanceForm, representative democracy among members]
-
A.
hasGovernanceLevel
Indicates the degree or tier of authority, control, or decision-making power that an entity holds within a governance structure.
-
B.
hasChurchGovernanceForm
Indicates that an organization or church is characterized by a specific form or structure of ecclesiastical governance.
-
C.
hasLocalGovernanceType
Indicates the specific form or system of local governance that applies to an entity.
-
D.
governanceDocumentAuthored
Indicates that a specific governance document was written or created by a particular author or authors.
-
E.
hasDecisionForm
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or represented by, a particular decision document or formal decision record.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a113ee881908e297a1d38dd79fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03ccef14c819099c5ebe962e7f867 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca935e2c8190b640987ddfc542b9 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69decf2e413481909d9180a8d78d2c17 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:16 a.m.