Triple

T15291169
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kala Lagaw Ya E365529 entity
Predicate isRelatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Paman languages E637801 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Paman languages | Statement: [Kala Lagaw Ya, isRelatedTo, Paman languages]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Paman languages
Context triple: [Kala Lagaw Ya, isRelatedTo, Paman languages]
  • A. Pama languages chosen
    The Pama languages are a major subgroup of Australian Aboriginal languages spoken across northern Australia, forming part of the broader Pama–Nyungan language family.
  • B. Pame languages
    The Pame languages are a small group of closely related Oto-Manguean indigenous languages spoken by the Pame people in central Mexico.
  • C. Kunama languages
    The Kunama languages are a small group of closely related languages spoken primarily by the Kunama people of western Eritrea and adjacent regions of Ethiopia.
  • D. Maban languages
    Maban languages are a small group of closely related Nilo-Saharan languages spoken primarily in eastern Chad and western Sudan.
  • E. Madang languages
    The Madang languages are a diverse group of Papuan languages spoken primarily in Madang Province of Papua New Guinea, noted for their complex phonologies and significant internal diversity.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a103d9081908c1ea6c4c73ac8e3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e03680b60c8190a3ea54a9d34c8105 completed April 16, 2026, 1:08 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69feef7d4da4819080f101c3a525ea11 completed May 9, 2026, 8:25 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:15 a.m.