Triple
T15270785
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Follett v. Town of McCormick |
E365013
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Murdock v. Pennsylvania |
E74317
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Murdock v. Pennsylvania | Statement: [Follett v. Town of McCormick, relatedTo, Murdock v. Pennsylvania]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Murdock v. Pennsylvania Context triple: [Follett v. Town of McCormick, relatedTo, Murdock v. Pennsylvania]
-
A.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
chosen
Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
-
B.
Prigg v. Pennsylvania
Prigg v. Pennsylvania was an 1842 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal supremacy over state laws in enforcing the return of escaped enslaved people, significantly strengthening the legal force of the Fugitive Slave Clause.
-
C.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
D.
Cooley v. Board of Wardens
Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
-
E.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0f08408190b3c3259ae35d79d2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0094eac848190a1740ae1aa6b28e0 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:55 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fee6046a088190a9ebea7672e36b73 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:14 a.m.