Triple
T15263700
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ethereum Virtual Machine |
E364845
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleInEthereum |
P268
|
FINISHED |
| Object | core of Ethereum execution layer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: core of Ethereum execution layer | Statement: [Ethereum Virtual Machine, roleInEthereum, core of Ethereum execution layer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInEthereum Context triple: [Ethereum Virtual Machine, roleInEthereum, core of Ethereum execution layer]
-
A.
typeOfRole
Indicates that one entity specifies the kind or category of role that another entity holds or performs.
-
B.
roleInCosmos
Indicates the function, position, or significance an entity holds within the larger structure or order of the cosmos.
-
C.
roleInBun
Indicates that an entity has a specific functional or contextual role within a particular bundle, grouping, or composite structure.
-
D.
role
chosen
Indicates the function, position, or responsibility that one entity holds in relation to another within a given context.
-
E.
consensusRole
Indicates that an entity participates in a consensus process with a specific functional role (e.g., proposer, validator, leader, or follower) within that agreement mechanism.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0f08408190b3c3259ae35d79d2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0084fed0481908e452c89cba2be82 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca8d1bd48190a4b94f29b425e335 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:14 a.m.