Triple

T15255351
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Google Cloud project E364630 entity
Predicate hasSecurityBoundary P68117 FINISHED
Object IAM policy at project level LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IAM policy at project level | Statement: [Google Cloud project, hasSecurityBoundary, IAM policy at project level]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecurityBoundary
Context triple: [Google Cloud project, hasSecurityBoundary, IAM policy at project level]
  • A. hasSecurityArea
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, assigned to, or falls within a defined security-controlled area or zone.
  • B. hasSecurityPresence
    Indicates that some form of security personnel, system, or measures are present at or associated with an entity or location.
  • C. hasSecurityDimension
    Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a particular aspect or dimension of security.
  • D. hasSecurityFunction
    Indicates that an entity performs, provides, or is responsible for a security-related role, protection mechanism, or safeguarding function for another entity or system.
  • E. hasBoundaryCriterion chosen
    Indicates that something is associated with a specific rule or condition used to define or limit its boundary.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0dde7481908fc64d1e82d5d20d completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e007f8cb308190933c4478aa096e24 completed April 15, 2026, 9:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deca8d1bd48190a4b94f29b425e335 completed April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:13 a.m.