Triple
T15248771
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Township Council–Manager |
E364458
|
entity |
| Predicate | managerAdvises |
P488
|
FINISHED |
| Object | council on policy options |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: council on policy options | Statement: [Township Council–Manager, managerAdvises, council on policy options]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: managerAdvises Context triple: [Township Council–Manager, managerAdvises, council on policy options]
-
A.
managementAdvantage
Indicates that one entity holds a superior position, benefit, or leverage over another in terms of control, coordination, or decision-making authority.
-
B.
managementIs
Indicates that one entity holds a managerial role, responsibility, or authority over another entity.
-
C.
manager
Indicates that one entity holds a supervisory or administrative role with authority and responsibility over another entity.
-
D.
manageThrough
Indicates that one entity exercises control, direction, or administration over another entity or process by means of an intermediary entity, channel, or mechanism.
-
E.
advises
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides guidance, recommendations, or counsel to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0dde7481908fc64d1e82d5d20d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e007f62b9c8190b9ad40e2d1912b63 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca8d1bd48190a4b94f29b425e335 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:13 a.m.