Triple

T15238749
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Averostra E364196 entity
Predicate commonMorphology P31789 FINISHED
Object hollow limb bones in many members LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hollow limb bones in many members | Statement: [Averostra, commonMorphology, hollow limb bones in many members]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonMorphology
Context triple: [Averostra, commonMorphology, hollow limb bones in many members]
  • A. notableMorphology
    Indicates that an entity is characterized by a distinctive or noteworthy physical form, structure, or shape.
  • B. morphologicalClass
    Indicates the classification of an entity based on its morphological form or structural pattern.
  • C. morphologicalComplexity
    Indicates the degree to which a language’s word forms are structurally intricate, involving multiple morphemes, inflections, or derivational processes.
  • D. relatedMorphologicalFeature chosen
    Indicates that one entity is connected to another through a shared or corresponding morphological feature or structure.
  • E. typicalWordFormation
    Indicates the usual or most common way in which a word is formed from other linguistic elements (such as roots, affixes, or compounds).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0dde7481908fc64d1e82d5d20d completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e007da7e988190925a9b67b8070bc7 completed April 15, 2026, 9:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deca899d5c8190be4a7c71e1683c69 completed April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m.