Triple

T15232569
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BGBl. Nr. 1/1930 as amended E364039 entity
Predicate requiresForOverallAmendment P117670 FINISHED
Object mandatory referendum LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mandatory referendum | Statement: [BGBl. Nr. 1/1930 as amended, requiresForOverallAmendment, mandatory referendum]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresForOverallAmendment
Context triple: [BGBl. Nr. 1/1930 as amended, requiresForOverallAmendment, mandatory referendum]
  • A. amendmentRequires
    Indicates that a particular amendment is necessary or must be applied in relation to another item, document, or condition.
  • B. supportedAmendment
    Indicates that one entity endorsed, backed, or voted in favor of a particular amendment.
  • C. isAmendmentTo
    Indicates that one item formally modifies, revises, or adds to the content or terms of another item.
  • D. hasAmendments
    Indicates that one entity (such as a document, law, or agreement) includes or is associated with one or more modifications, changes, or additions made after its original creation.
  • E. soughtToAmend
    Indicates an attempt or effort by one party to change, modify, or revise something, such as a document, rule, or agreement.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0ce24c81909c4d3b6475548c95 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e007d7237081908dc17900ee66b64f completed April 15, 2026, 9:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deca899d5c8190be4a7c71e1683c69 completed April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69decf2ca6148190967c319728ec3661 completed April 14, 2026, 11:35 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m.