Triple
T15232089
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mr Justice |
E364028
|
entity |
| Predicate | contrastedWith |
P278
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lord Justice |
E222074
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lord Justice | Statement: [Mr Justice, contrastedWith, Lord Justice]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lord Justice Context triple: [Mr Justice, contrastedWith, Lord Justice]
-
A.
Lord Justice
chosen
Lord Justice is a senior judicial title used for appellate judges in certain UK jurisdictions, including Northern Ireland.
-
B.
Mr Justice
Mr Justice is the traditional formal title used for male judges in certain higher courts, particularly in common law jurisdictions such as England and Wales.
-
C.
Lord Judge
Lord Judge is a prominent British jurist who served as Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales.
-
D.
Lord Justice James
Lord Justice James was a prominent 19th-century British appellate judge renowned for his influential decisions in equity and Chancery law.
-
E.
Lord Justice Knight-Bruce
Lord Justice Knight-Bruce was a prominent 19th-century British judge and Lord Justice of Appeal in Chancery known for his influential role in the development of English equity law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0ce24c81909c4d3b6475548c95 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0078e27408190bc13c0ca441f5594 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fedd3beae88190a91af2c9a7def8f8 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m.