Triple

T15231834
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Deputy Lieutenant E364021 entity
Predicate mayUsePostNominal P26625 FINISHED
Object DL LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: DL | Statement: [Deputy Lieutenant, mayUsePostNominal, DL]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayUsePostNominal
Context triple: [Deputy Lieutenant, mayUsePostNominal, DL]
  • A. hasPostnominalLetters
    Indicates that a person holds specific postnominal letters (abbreviations after their name) signifying qualifications, honors, or titles.
  • B. hasPostNominal
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a post-nominal title, abbreviation, or letters that follow a name to denote qualifications, honors, or status.
  • C. nonPostNominal
    Indicates that the related element does not appear in a post-nominal position (i.e., it does not follow the noun it modifies or relates to).
  • D. postNominalLetters
    Indicates that a person is associated with specific letters placed after their name to denote qualifications, honors, or professional affiliations.
  • E. usedAfterNameOf chosen
    Indicates that something is used immediately following the mention or specification of a name.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0ce24c81909c4d3b6475548c95 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0078e27408190bc13c0ca441f5594 completed April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deca899d5c8190be4a7c71e1683c69 completed April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m.