Triple

T15224223
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Steve Bartman E363834 entity
Predicate publicApology P56122 FINISHED
Object issued written statement of apology in 2003 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: issued written statement of apology in 2003 | Statement: [Steve Bartman, publicApology, issued written statement of apology in 2003]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: publicApology
Context triple: [Steve Bartman, publicApology, issued written statement of apology in 2003]
  • A. apologyIssued
    Indicates that one entity has expressed regret or remorse to another entity for a perceived wrong, mistake, or offense.
  • B. apologizedFor
    Indicates that one entity expressed regret or remorse to another entity specifically about a particular action, event, or wrongdoing.
  • C. typeOfApology
    Indicates that one entity specifies the particular kind or category of apology expressed in relation to another entity.
  • D. apologyIssuedBy chosen
    Indicates that an apology has been made by a specific entity as the source or initiator of that apology.
  • E. apologeticFunction
    Indicates that one entity expresses regret or remorse to another, acknowledging fault or seeking forgiveness for an action or outcome.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0ce24c81909c4d3b6475548c95 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0078a9318819081db3b7bcc28e04f completed April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deca8479188190b2e5d3bc708d7d07 completed April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m.