Triple

T15223688
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject demonstrated tactical superiority of T-formation offense E363822 entity
Predicate typeOfAdvantage P23572 FINISHED
Object tactical superiority LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tactical superiority | Statement: [demonstrated tactical superiority of T-formation offense, typeOfAdvantage, tactical superiority]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfAdvantage
Context triple: [demonstrated tactical superiority of T-formation offense, typeOfAdvantage, tactical superiority]
  • A. notableAdvantage
    Indicates that one entity possesses a significant benefit, edge, or favorable quality over another entity or in a given context.
  • B. advantageDefinition
    Indicates that one entity defines or specifies the nature, scope, or meaning of an advantage associated with another entity.
  • C. benefitCharacteristic
    Indicates that one entity possesses a quality or feature that provides an advantage, usefulness, or positive effect to another entity.
  • D. perkType chosen
    Indicates the specific category or kind of benefit, bonus, or advantage associated with an entity or situation.
  • E. typeOfAdvance
    Indicates that one entity represents a specific kind or category of advance (e.g., payment, progress, or development) in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0ce24c81909c4d3b6475548c95 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0078a9318819081db3b7bcc28e04f completed April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deca8479188190b2e5d3bc708d7d07 completed April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m.