Triple

T15222672
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Note Crisis of 1961 E363799 entity
Predicate typeOfPressure P33637 FINISHED
Object diplomatic pressure LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: diplomatic pressure | Statement: [Note Crisis of 1961, typeOfPressure, diplomatic pressure]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfPressure
Context triple: [Note Crisis of 1961, typeOfPressure, diplomatic pressure]
  • A. pressureType chosen
    Indicates the specific category or kind of pressure associated with an entity or interaction.
  • B. typicalPressure
    Indicates the usual or characteristic level of pressure typically associated with an entity, situation, or condition.
  • C. pressureFrom
    Indicates a relationship where one entity exerts influence, coercion, or force on another to affect its decisions, actions, or state.
  • D. pressureRange
    Indicates the range of pressure values within which a condition, process, or relationship is defined or valid.
  • E. hasHumanPressure
    Indicates that one entity exerts or experiences human-induced influence, stress, or impact in relation to another entity or environment.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0ce24c81909c4d3b6475548c95 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e00788b04881909dad9b346ce3b4a9 completed April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deca8479188190b2e5d3bc708d7d07 completed April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m.