Triple
T15216752
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sogn region |
E363655
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalCounty |
P1069
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sogn og Fjordane |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sogn og Fjordane | Statement: [Sogn region, historicalCounty, Sogn og Fjordane]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sogn og Fjordane Context triple: [Sogn region, historicalCounty, Sogn og Fjordane]
-
A.
Sogn og Fjordane
chosen
Sogn og Fjordane was a former county in western Norway known for its dramatic fjords, mountains, and coastal landscapes.
-
B.
Hordaland
Hordaland was a former county in western Norway known for its fjords, coastal landscapes, and the city of Bergen.
-
C.
Hedmarken
Hedmarken is a traditional district in Innlandet county in eastern Norway, known for its agricultural landscapes and its central town, Hamar.
-
D.
Hedmark
Hedmark is a former county in eastern Norway known for its vast forests, agriculture, and inland landscapes along the Swedish border.
-
E.
Møre og Romsdal
Møre og Romsdal is a coastal county in western Norway known for its dramatic fjords, islands, and mountainous landscapes.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0ce24c81909c4d3b6475548c95 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0076f90c481909989befe031a2cae |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:11 a.m.