Triple

T15207519
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Flag of Botswana E363426 entity
Predicate whiteBordersRepresent P117125 FINISHED
Object the white minority population LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: the white minority population | Statement: [Flag of Botswana, whiteBordersRepresent, the white minority population]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: whiteBordersRepresent
Context triple: [Flag of Botswana, whiteBordersRepresent, the white minority population]
  • A. recognizedBorder
    Indicates that one entity formally acknowledges and accepts another entity’s boundary as a legitimate border.
  • B. supportsBorders
    Indicates that one entity endorses, maintains, or upholds the existence or enforcement of boundaries or borders associated with another entity.
  • C. usedAsBorder
    Indicates that one entity functions as a boundary or dividing line for another entity.
  • D. sharesBorderType
    Indicates that two entities are connected by a common boundary characterized by the same specified type of border (e.g., land, river, maritime).
  • E. hadBorderType
    Indicates that a boundary between two entities existed and specifies the nature or classification of that border (e.g., land, maritime, disputed).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0b78bc8190b6e5ad51a2c4cfc5 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e006b8e2788190bd1831762e4181ae completed April 15, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deb97ee9d881908711dbe12a55283c completed April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dec72059c08190a34f513a00185b08 completed April 14, 2026, 11 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:11 a.m.