Triple
T15188872
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Casey Stengel |
E362950
|
entity |
| Predicate | managedMetsTo |
P117054
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1965 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1965 | Statement: [Casey Stengel, managedMetsTo, 1965]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: managedMetsTo Context triple: [Casey Stengel, managedMetsTo, 1965]
-
A.
managedIn
Indicates that one entity is administered, operated, or overseen within the scope, control, or jurisdiction of another entity.
-
B.
managedTo
Indicates that an entity successfully accomplished or achieved a particular action or outcome, often despite difficulty or obstacles.
-
C.
manageThrough
Indicates that one entity exercises control, direction, or administration over another entity or process by means of an intermediary entity, channel, or mechanism.
-
D.
managedUntil
Indicates that one entity was responsible for managing or overseeing another entity up to a specific point in time.
-
E.
managedAs
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or handled in the same way or under the same policies, procedures, or classification as another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a09a39c81908759f23268e2d408 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0067beedc8190abc0a94c7a38f85e |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb97bd8bc8190b2ad4888f97cf963 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dec72059c08190a34f513a00185b08 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:09 a.m.