Triple
T15188871
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Casey Stengel |
E362950
|
entity |
| Predicate | managedMetsFrom |
P117053
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1962 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1962 | Statement: [Casey Stengel, managedMetsFrom, 1962]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: managedMetsFrom Context triple: [Casey Stengel, managedMetsFrom, 1962]
-
A.
managedIn
Indicates that one entity is administered, operated, or overseen within the scope, control, or jurisdiction of another entity.
-
B.
managedAs
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or handled in the same way or under the same policies, procedures, or classification as another entity.
-
C.
isManagedThrough
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or operated by means of another entity, typically specifying the mechanism, channel, or system used for its management.
-
D.
managedTo
Indicates that an entity successfully accomplished or achieved a particular action or outcome, often despite difficulty or obstacles.
-
E.
laterManagedBy
Indicates that an entity was, at a subsequent time, managed or overseen by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a09a39c81908759f23268e2d408 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0067beedc8190abc0a94c7a38f85e |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb97bd8bc8190b2ad4888f97cf963 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dec72059c08190a34f513a00185b08 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:09 a.m.