Triple
T1517699
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pepa |
E32157
|
entity |
| Predicate | soundProduction |
P22084
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lip-vibrated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lip-vibrated | Statement: [Pepa, soundProduction, lip-vibrated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: soundProduction Context triple: [Pepa, soundProduction, lip-vibrated]
-
A.
soundReproductionMethod
Indicates the method or technique used to reproduce or play back sound.
-
B.
soundtrackProducer
Indicates that one entity is the producer responsible for creating or overseeing the soundtrack associated with another entity (such as a film, game, or show).
-
C.
acousticalDesigner
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the acoustical designer responsible for planning or shaping the sound characteristics of another entity (such as a space, product, or performance).
-
D.
soundCharacter
Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies the quality, style, or distinguishing characteristics of a sound produced or perceived in another entity.
-
E.
hasSound
chosen
Indicates that an entity produces, emits, or is associated with a particular sound.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885e8caf88190a5fbb6159ce87786 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a9396e16408190b5e7b0ac43376d81 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907aa67cc81909f00135365447399 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.