Triple

T15157663
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Federal Rule of Evidence 1008 E362119 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Federal Rule of Evidence 1001 E1100622 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rule of Evidence 1001 | Statement: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1008, relatedTo, Federal Rule of Evidence 1001]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Federal Rule of Evidence 1001
Context triple: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1008, relatedTo, Federal Rule of Evidence 1001]
  • A. Federal Rule of Evidence 1001 chosen
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1001 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that defines key terms governing the admissibility and handling of writings, recordings, and photographs in court.
  • B. Federal Rule of Evidence 1002
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 is the “best evidence” rule that generally requires the original writing, recording, or photograph to prove its content in court.
  • C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1006
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
  • E. Federal Rule of Evidence 1004
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1004 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that sets out when secondary evidence may be used in place of an original writing, recording, or photograph, such as when the original is lost, destroyed, or otherwise unobtainable.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0060c62b08190bcdbd912d011d1ba completed April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fec88419108190860319a9bcab1eef completed May 9, 2026, 5:39 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.