Triple

T15156888
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire E362101 entity
Predicate factSummary P8229 FINISHED
Object Walter Chaplinsky, a Jehovah’s Witness, was convicted under a New Hampshire law for calling a city marshal offensive names in a public place E362101 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Walter Chaplinsky, a Jehovah’s Witness, was convicted under a New Hampshire law for calling a city marshal offensive names in a public place | Statement: [Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, factSummary, Walter Chaplinsky, a Jehovah’s Witness, was convicted under a New Hampshire law for calling a city marshal offensive names in a public place]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Walter Chaplinsky, a Jehovah’s Witness, was convicted under a New Hampshire law for calling a city marshal offensive names in a public place
Context triple: [Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, factSummary, Walter Chaplinsky, a Jehovah’s Witness, was convicted under a New Hampshire law for calling a city marshal offensive names in a public place]
  • A. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire chosen
    Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
  • B. Shadrach Minkins case
    The Shadrach Minkins case was a landmark 1851 legal and political battle in Boston over the capture and rescue of an escaped enslaved man, which galvanized Northern resistance to the Fugitive Slave Act and intensified sectional tensions before the Civil War.
  • C. Marie Gitlow
    Marie Gitlow was the wife of American socialist politician and activist Benjamin Gitlow.
  • D. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton
    Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a village ordinance requiring door-to-door canvassers to obtain a permit, holding that it violated First Amendment protections for anonymous religious and political advocacy.
  • E. James Schenck
    James Schenck is a jazz bassist best known for his work on Max Roach’s landmark civil rights–themed album "We Insist! Freedom Now Suite."
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0060c62b08190bcdbd912d011d1ba completed April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69febff87b6c819097f5cc99b2d75fb6 completed May 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.