Triple
T15156852
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | International Shoe Co. v. Washington |
E362100
|
entity |
| Predicate | citationStyle |
P4468
|
FINISHED |
| Object | International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) |
E362100
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) | Statement: [International Shoe Co. v. Washington, citationStyle, International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) Context triple: [International Shoe Co. v. Washington, citationStyle, International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)]
-
A.
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
chosen
International Shoe Co. v. Washington is a landmark 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern "minimum contacts" standard for determining when a state may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.
-
B.
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States is a 1962 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that set influential but controversial standards for evaluating vertical and conglomerate mergers under the Clayton Act.
-
C.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
-
D.
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld minimum wage laws and effectively ended the Lochner era by allowing greater government regulation of economic conditions.
-
E.
United States v. Carolene Products Co.
United States v. Carolene Products Co. is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for its Footnote Four, which laid the groundwork for modern constitutional scrutiny of legislation affecting fundamental rights and discrete and insular minorities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0060c62b08190bcdbd912d011d1ba |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69febff87b6c819097f5cc99b2d75fb6 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.