Triple
T15156656
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nixon v. Condon |
E362096
|
entity |
| Predicate | clarifiedDoctrine |
P13052
|
FINISHED |
| Object | scope of state action in relation to political parties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: scope of state action in relation to political parties | Statement: [Nixon v. Condon, clarifiedDoctrine, scope of state action in relation to political parties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clarifiedDoctrine Context triple: [Nixon v. Condon, clarifiedDoctrine, scope of state action in relation to political parties]
-
A.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
-
B.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
C.
primaryDoctrine
Indicates that the object represents the main or foundational doctrine associated with the subject.
-
D.
goalOfDoctrine
Indicates that a specified objective or end state is the intended goal or purpose of a particular doctrine.
-
E.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0060c62b08190bcdbd912d011d1ba |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb9779acc81908ed2dad382c42dca |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.