Triple
T15156630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nixon v. Condon |
E362096
|
entity |
| Predicate | foundUnconstitutional |
P9376
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Texas statutory scheme delegating to party executive committees the power to determine voter qualifications for primaries |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas statutory scheme delegating to party executive committees the power to determine voter qualifications for primaries | Statement: [Nixon v. Condon, foundUnconstitutional, Texas statutory scheme delegating to party executive committees the power to determine voter qualifications for primaries]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: foundUnconstitutional Context triple: [Nixon v. Condon, foundUnconstitutional, Texas statutory scheme delegating to party executive committees the power to determine voter qualifications for primaries]
-
A.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
chosen
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
-
B.
mayBeDeclaredUnconstitutionalBy
Indicates that one entity (typically a law, policy, or action) can be judged and formally ruled as unconstitutional by another entity (typically a court or constitutional authority).
-
C.
foundUnlawfulBy
Indicates that an entity has been judged or determined to have acted unlawfully by a particular authority or decision-making body.
-
D.
reasonUnconstitutional
Indicates that something is deemed to violate a constitution and is therefore considered legally unconstitutional.
-
E.
yearDeclaredUnconstitutional
Indicates the specific year in which a law, policy, or legal provision was officially ruled unconstitutional.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0060c62b08190bcdbd912d011d1ba |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb9779acc81908ed2dad382c42dca |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.