Triple

T15155066
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Poynting theorem E362048 entity
Predicate hasIntegralForm P116946 FINISHED
Object d/dt ∫_V u dV = - ∮_∂V S·dA - ∫_V J·E dV LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: d/dt ∫_V u dV = - ∮_∂V S·dA - ∫_V J·E dV | Statement: [Poynting theorem, hasIntegralForm, d/dt ∫_V u dV = - ∮_∂V S·dA - ∫_V J·E dV]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIntegralForm
Context triple: [Poynting theorem, hasIntegralForm, d/dt ∫_V u dV = - ∮_∂V S·dA - ∫_V J·E dV]
  • A. isIntegralFormOf
    Indicates that one entity is the integral (indefinite integral or antiderivative) form corresponding to another entity, typically a derivative or differential expression.
  • B. hasIntegralRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity can be expressed or represented as an integral involving the other entity.
  • C. isIntegralOver
    Indicates that one algebraic structure (typically a ring element or extension) satisfies a monic polynomial with coefficients in another ring, expressing that it is algebraically dependent on and “integral over” that base ring.
  • D. isIntegral
    Indicates that a value belongs to the set of integers, having no fractional or decimal component.
  • E. hasClosedForm
    Indicates that a mathematical expression, function, or solution can be written in a finite, explicit form using a standard set of operations and well-known functions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0060b0cd08190afad14cffcc7d93f completed April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deb9779acc81908ed2dad382c42dca completed April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dec72059c08190a34f513a00185b08 completed April 14, 2026, 11 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.