Triple
T15142459
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nostalgia |
E361718
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMixtapeSequenceContext |
P117487
|
FINISHED |
| Object | early track on 10 Day |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early track on 10 Day | Statement: [Nostalgia, hasMixtapeSequenceContext, early track on 10 Day]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMixtapeSequenceContext Context triple: [Nostalgia, hasMixtapeSequenceContext, early track on 10 Day]
-
A.
hasAlbumSequenceContext
Indicates that an album is associated with a particular position or contextual role within a sequence of albums.
-
B.
isMedleyWith
Indicates that two or more musical pieces are combined and performed together as a continuous medley.
-
C.
mixtapeAppearance
Indicates that an entity appears on, or is featured in, a particular mixtape.
-
D.
hasTypicalSequence
Indicates that there is a usual or commonly occurring order or progression in which the related entities or events take place.
-
E.
mixtapeSeries
Indicates a relationship where a mixtape is part of, or belongs to, a particular series of related mixtapes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e005c5c4248190b57234e3ccf2831b |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb9713fe881909dec2fd3f6c84b39 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dec71e8dcc81908badc834b6ccf273 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:07 a.m.